San Marino’s ruling majority has weighed in on the investigation involving several figures linked to Giochi del Titano S.p.A., reaffirming respect for the independence of the judiciary and the presumption of innocence. In a statement issued on 3 October, the governing parties called for the inquiry to establish the full facts while stressing the importance of ensuring the company’s continuity and protecting its workforce.
“The majority is following with the utmost attention the developments of the investigation involving several figures at Giochi del Titano S.p.A.,” reads the statement signed by the Sammarinese Christian Democratic Party (PDCS), Libera, the Party of Socialists and Democrats (PSD), Reformist Alliance and independent councillor Giovanna Cecchetti (PSRS). “These are serious matters, and it is right that full clarity be established through the proper channels, in respect of the judiciary’s independence, the guarantees provided by law, and the principle of presumption of innocence.”
The statement also highlighted the role of oversight mechanisms and international cooperation in combating illicit activity: “What is emerging also demonstrates the importance of control mechanisms and cooperation between the authorities of San Marino and those of other countries in tackling illicit activities and, in particular, money laundering. It is in this capacity for cooperation, oversight and investigation that our institutions must continue to invest.”
Another key point concerned the continued operation of the company. “The majority also believes it is essential that Giochi del Titano — a publicly owned company and a significant player in San Marino’s economic system — be able to carry on its activities normally, ensuring business continuity, protection for its workers, and full cooperation with the competent authorities.”
As for accountability, the signatories reiterated that this will be a matter for judicial investigation to determine. “The inquiry must clarify the facts and any responsibilities involved,” the statement notes, concluding with a call to keep the judicial process separate from political judgment: “In this context, we do not believe it useful to pre-empt conclusions on individual responsibility, which is for the judiciary to establish, nor to conflate the judicial investigation with the political and institutional assessments that fall within the remit of politics.”
